<meta name='google-adsense-platform-account' content='ca-host-pub-1556223355139109'/> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-domain' content='blogspot.com'/> <!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head><body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/2809440172794460995?origin\x3dhttp://lack-of-boxes.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
strange [and weird] maths proof... Muahaha...
Friday, July 31, 2009 9:34 PM

Yay! Decided not to be Weird now...

Let's try something normal but weird.. Found something.. Says tt all triangles are eqilateral triangle, and this is the proof::

Consider a triangle ABC. Bisect BC, and call the point of bisection D. Construct a perpendicular from this point. Bisect angle BAC. Find the point where the angle bisector intersects the perpendicular constructed previously, and call it E.

Now construct a line from E perpendicular to AB. The point where it meets AB will be called F. Do the same on the other side: construct a line from E perpendicular to AC, and call the point of intersection G.

Now, ED is congruent to itself, and the angle EDB and EDC were both constructed as right angles, and DB is congruent to DC because D was chosen to bisect BC. Thus, the triangles EDB and EDC are congruent.

The angles EFA and EGA were both constructed as right angles, the angles FAE and GAE are the halves of a bisected angle, and of course AE is congruent to itself. Thus, the triangles FAE and GAE are congruent.

EB is congruent to EC, because they are corresponding parts of the congruent triangles EDB and EDC. Likewise, FE and GE are corresponding parts of FAE and GAE. Since the angles BFE and CGE are right angles, it follows that FEB and GEC are congruent (angle-side-side sufficing in the special case of a right angle).

Now, AF and AG are corresponding parts of FAE and GAE, and FB and GC are corresponding parts of FEB and GEC. Since AF=AG and FB=GC, AF+FB=AG+GC. Thus, AB=AC.

As a corolloary, it's simple to show that all triangles are equilateral, because it can be shown by the same method that AB=BC and BC=AC

Muahaha.. spend some time to figure out.. Draw it out or whatever.. There is no error with the proof...

---> Weirded weirdly by the weird weird Worksheet 3.142,

Labels:



Weirdo Clan! posted it up.


SO WHO ARE WE?
Weirdos and Weirdettes.
No. 1 RoyalMissy :P
No. 0.60 Magnexium :8)
No. 3.14 Worksheet 3.142 !:-)
No. 4. Fang Reaper

Rational Behind It All
We're all special in our own ways. That makes us uniquely, us.


We're who we are
As time passes by, you'll notice that everyone has their own quirks and idiosyncrasies, so instead of fearing it and hiding it, why not just embrace it? Everyone's different in their own way, and we mean this is the best way possible. It's what makes us who we are, and we're proud to show it.

PEN-PALS

RoyalMissay
Magnexium
Worksheet 3.142!
Fang Reaper


TAGBOARD

Write to Us!!


BACK-TRACK ARCHIVES

July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
June 2011